Thursday, June 01, 2006

Structure, Structure, Structure

Yesterday in rehearsal Jonathan and I discussed how to structure our duet. I think this gets to a central question in creating art - especially, maybe mostly, improvisational work. How do you decide on a structure? What does "structure" even mean? Is it important? There is certainly a case to be made to have a set structure for every work. This would mean that even though we are not setting particulars there is a place where we always begin, move through and end. For example, we could set that we always start at the back of the stage with both of us playing the guitar, this slowly transitions into both of us moving around the stage and then ends with Jonathan playing the guitar and me dancing. The other extreme of this is to set nothing - really just both choose where to start as we're walking on stage and then begin and see what happens. Yesterday we discussed something in between - that for each performance we would randomly choose the order of the sections, but we would go through those sections in a particular order for that performance. The next question that comes up out of this discussion is, how does the order of the section effect the meaning of the performance - for both us as performers and, certainly, the audience. If you set the structure than you can be sure of a certain flow of the piece, but if you leave it open, or change it each time, that changes the arc. In fact it calls into question the whole idea of the dramatic arc.

Most times when seeing a performance - especially dance or theater - we are use to following a dramatic arc. Usually something happens, something changes from the beginning to the end. We have conflict, or development, or some kind of progression. We also know, either consciously or intuitively, that that arc was chosen and set by the creator of the work. We can trust that the structure was intentional and specific. But, if there is no predetermined structure, or the structure is determined for each performance by chance, what does that imply to meaning? This is an age-old post-modern question, but we're in the mix of it right now and trying to wrestle with these options. During this last rehearsal we randomly created a structure (using a computer) and tried it and was quite satisfied with the structure. But, what happens if the computer creates a structure that we don't "like", or feels "inorganic"? We will continue to explore random generated structure for the next couple of rehearsals and see what happens.

4 comments:

DBurkholder said...

No need to worry - the work will be approximately 40 minutes long, we'll take a 20 minute break and then begin again...

MAC said...

I think the audience always creates its own meaning--even if you think you're creating it for them! It's like montage theory from film--I think it applies here too. Shaking up the order of things will just imply different relationships among the component pieces--but these relationships are just as resonant as the ones you'd be most inclined to present.

DBurkholder said...

Marc,
I basically agree with you. One of the issues that we are throwing around is the fact that some of our audience will know us and our history and some will not. If you know that Jonathan is a musician and I'm a dancer and you've seen us perform before that would lead you to "understand" seeing us in the opposite roles in a different way than if you had no context of us. So, do we start with us in our "traditional" roles so that all of the audience sees us that way? Or do we not worry about that and just open it up to any starting point. Obviously, either is valid and the audience does interpret things in so many ways that you don't realize. But, I think it is important for us to go through this process of figuring out what makes sense for our performance experience - then, hopefully, it will make sense and have meaning for the audience - even if that meaning is somewhat unpredictable.

MAC said...

Daniel -
That's a great point--I had not thought at all of how the audience will think about you as a musician or Jonathan as a mover! They so love to keep us in their little categories!

neat blog, by the by. Sorry my picture pops up when I comment--I have just enough knowledge of how this stuff works to be dangerous ...